ADA Depot - A Forum To Support Users of ADA Amplification Gear

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Need a Schematic? Check the Vault *MP-1 Classic Schematics Just Added!!

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes  (Read 26137 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

rnolan

  • Administrator
  • Superhero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5998
Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« on: Time Format »

And again, (and probably a more hot topic) preamp tubes (12A??s).  My fave (no secret) are Mullard 12AX7s, I've been using the long plates.  I've got a soft spot for JJs particularly for MP1, the Mullards are better in MP2 IMHO.
Logged
Studio Rig: Stuff; Live Rig: More Stuff; Guitars: A few

robertkoa

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #1 on: Time Format »

My MP1  came with 2 JJ 83s tubes  and has a  nice clear sound (I don't  like buzzy, fuzzy distortion ).

But I am wondering if a JJ  803s  the longplate might be even smoother /clearer .

On my Hughes @Kettner Tubeman the  JJ 803s  was much more clear.

Anyone tried them in the  MP1 ?V
Logged

rnolan

  • Administrator
  • Superhero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5998
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #2 on: Time Format »

Haven't tried them myself but others here may have ?  I used the Boogie STRs in my MP1 (most likely re-badged JJs but not sure which version, short plates though IIRC).
Longplates are a little more prone to microphonics compared to short plates but I don't think that would be a big issue for your MP1 (depending where you mount it e.g. on top of loud speaker box = more vibration).  MJMP advises not to put long plates in 3TM (but that's super high gain (3 tubes...)) and makes sense.
Personally, I'd try the Mullard long plates (http://www.dougstubes.com/preamp-tubes/12ax7-ecc83-7025/mullard-12ax7.html), I use them in both my MP2s, great tube, very 3D, very smooth.  They also do a short plate model Mullard (http://www.dougstubes.com/preamp-tubes/12ax7-ecc83-7025/mullard-cv4004-12ax7.html) that one of the guys here tried in his MP1 (and liked allot).  Also from the old Depot board, a member tried them (also MP1, long plates), a he loved them.

Anyway let us know how you go, I'm sure the JJ 803s will sound fine.
Logged
Studio Rig: Stuff; Live Rig: More Stuff; Guitars: A few

trader144

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 149
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #3 on: Time Format »

fWIW, I have a pair of Rubys and they do not sound as good as I had hoped, I read that the preamp tubes do not need to be matched, only the power amp tubes need I be matched. In fact one of the guys who is all digital pedal boards claimed the recorded sound was too digital sounding when mixing for internet broadcasts, but other people liked the same sound when it was live (ouch for an Mp1 guy but so many things change the sound)

In addition to the recommendations here, most of the reviews I have read elsewhere have said very positive things about the mullard reissues except on the jobonamosa group. One of the senior members on the Marshall.com group said he uses a mullard in his YJM100.

I have also been told that the mullard reissue long plates are the 12ax7 and the mullard reissue shortplates are CV4004.

I will post my experience once my mullard long plates arrive.
Logged
Guitars: Malmsteen strat, Fender '62 reissue
Rig: Avid 11 Rack -> ADA MP-1 (stock) ->  ADA Microtube 100 -> ADA split stack

rickeb1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 113
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #4 on: Time Format »

I have an MP-1 with the 3TM mod, and I am really happy using the long plate Sovtek 12AX7-LPS tubes.  They replaced a set of JJs that were good, but these LPS sounded thicker and richer to me, so I kept them in!

I just received an MP-2 (discussed more in another thread).  When I ran through some of the presets when I got it, I was very disappointed in the high gain tones, as they were not very high gain at all, and anything other than clean tones just didn't sound that good.  I opened it up and found 2 Groove Tube 12AX7-R tubes.  I replaced them with the JJs I mentioned above, and it sounded *way* better, so tubes definitely make a difference!  I'm planning on trying the LPS in the MP-2 as well, and I'm definitely tempted to try the reissue Mullards based on rnolan's unwavering endorsement!  :)
Logged

rickeb1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 113
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #5 on: Time Format »

Just a quick follow-up.  I put a pair of Sovtek 12AX7-LPS in the MP-2, and the thick, rich high gain just brought a smile to my face!  I still plan to try the long plate Mullards because rnolan knows what he is talking about.  :)  But for now, I'm really happy with the LPS!
Logged

rnolan

  • Administrator
  • Superhero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5998
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #6 on: Time Format »

Glad you like the Sovteks in the MP2  :thumb-up: , audophile mate of mine loves them also albeit he wants crystal clean and no distortion in his hifi preamp.
The Mullard long plates seem hard to get at the moment, I hope they aren't caught up in the Russian sanctions... When I first put the in my MP2 I was amazed at how good they sounded, I was swapping out some new Boogie STRs, also a nice tube but not quite as good, particularly for the way I play.
Logged
Studio Rig: Stuff; Live Rig: More Stuff; Guitars: A few

Systematic Chaos

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 705
  • Blood type: Becks Positive
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #7 on: Time Format »

Just a quick follow-up.  I put a pair of Sovtek 12AX7-LPS in the MP-2, and the thick, rich high gain just brought a smile to my face!  I still plan to try the long plate Mullards because rnolan knows what he is talking about.  :)  But for now, I'm really happy with the LPS!
That's very interesting....I always found the 12AX7LPS too "boring" sounding in preamp stages. Imho it lacks the detail and harmonic content of e.g. the Mullards (reissues)...
However, in the poweramp PI slot the Sovtek 12AX7LPS is magic.....
Logged

El Chiguete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 671
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #8 on: Time Format »

However, in the poweramp PI slot the Sovtek 12AX7LPS is magic.....

What, where, when???  :???: jeje

Kidding aside can you explain this? Are you talking about an MP-1 or another amp/preamp?
Logged
Before you see the light, you must die!!!

'87 Kramer Stagemaster Custom
'81 Kramer Pacer Standard
custom made Les Paul
ADA MP1
Rane MPE 28
Lexicon MPX-G2
Epiphone Valve Jr. moded!!!

AFFA
Support Your Local 81

rnolan

  • Administrator
  • Superhero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5998
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #9 on: Time Format »

Hey El, SCs talking about the 1st input tube(s) in a poweramp which typically you want to be clean and transparent and not add colour. My mate (mentioned previously) likes them in his HiFi preamp for the line input stage (CD player, AM/FM Radio, cassette player etc).  I think he has other preferences for the phono input (as it needs to add gain), he's still very much into vinyl records etc as they do sound so much better than CDs if you have the right equipment and good pressings.
Logged
Studio Rig: Stuff; Live Rig: More Stuff; Guitars: A few

rabidgerry

  • Superhero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2105
  • HEAVY METAL
    • Rabid Bitch of the North band facebook
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #10 on: Time Format »

I asked a stupid question about valves in the tech area which was silly.  This is very useful right here.  I will read the article whilst I do nothing in work today (for all those whom like the bananas)  :banana-trip:

thanks rnolan
Logged
"whadda ya want? we want Heavy Metal"

Guitars:1986 Westone Dimension IV, 1989 Korean Squier Fat Strat Silver Series, 1998 Korean Squier Fat Strat, MIM Fender Fat Strat - FR, Squier Stagemaster Deluxe - Thru Neck x 2, Squier Stagemaster 22 Fret - 1st Gen, 1999 Squier Showmaster - Anniversary Edition, Squier Showmaster, Tokai FV40 Flying V

Effects:  Ada Mp1, Peavey Rockmaster, Boss GX700 Boss SX700 * Amps:   Rocktron Velocity 300 - Koch ATR4502 - Peavey Classic 50/50
Cabs: 4 x Bugera 2 x 12"
Midi Controller: Behringer FCB1010

rabidgerry

  • Superhero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2105
  • HEAVY METAL
    • Rabid Bitch of the North band facebook
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #11 on: Time Format »

is there any tube specific to a position in the mp1?  For example do people think one tube sounds better in postion 1 than say position 2?  Or do you all find matched pairs are best?

Forgive my new personness
Logged
"whadda ya want? we want Heavy Metal"

Guitars:1986 Westone Dimension IV, 1989 Korean Squier Fat Strat Silver Series, 1998 Korean Squier Fat Strat, MIM Fender Fat Strat - FR, Squier Stagemaster Deluxe - Thru Neck x 2, Squier Stagemaster 22 Fret - 1st Gen, 1999 Squier Showmaster - Anniversary Edition, Squier Showmaster, Tokai FV40 Flying V

Effects:  Ada Mp1, Peavey Rockmaster, Boss GX700 Boss SX700 * Amps:   Rocktron Velocity 300 - Koch ATR4502 - Peavey Classic 50/50
Cabs: 4 x Bugera 2 x 12"
Midi Controller: Behringer FCB1010

trader144

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 149
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #12 on: Time Format »

Yes each position is different as is each tube,
and it depends on your taste.
Ultimately you will have to try both on your own, but V1 is for harder drive than V2.

I have read that matching is only important for power tubes not preamp tubes (mp1 is a preamp)
Makes sense as noted above. I have different tubes in my mp-1 right now.

If you search the site for "mullard" you will find lots of recent tube discussions
Logged
Guitars: Malmsteen strat, Fender '62 reissue
Rig: Avid 11 Rack -> ADA MP-1 (stock) ->  ADA Microtube 100 -> ADA split stack

rnolan

  • Administrator
  • Superhero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5998
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #13 on: Time Format »

Hey rabidgerry, trader144  is correct, matched pairs (see elsewhere hear or on Dougs tubes for definition of matched etc) are more important in a tube poweramp that's running push/pull (class B) as each tube does one half of the signal/wave (think sine wave, one tube does top +ve, other does bottom -ve, bias gets set where one takes over from the other). So you want them to be matched for same output.
In MP1/2 preamps, each tube gives you 2 stages of gain (twin triode) so in MP1/2 4 gain stages, 3TM 6 gain stages as the signal is fed progressively through each tube gathering gain on the way (depending on settings, e.g. EL sometimes run his V2 at 0).  So selecting different tubes for V1 and V2 makes a difference and some experiment with various tubes in either position to get the sound they want.  Some try a lower gain tube like 12AT7s instead of the higher gain 12AX7s.
I've always kept it simple and use a pair of the same 12AX7s, previously Boogie STRs (jjs) and now Mullard long plates.  You can play around (tube rolling) but at a cost and probably end up with a drawer full of tubes you don't want.  From another post you said your were thinking about the Mullard short plates (http://www.dougstubes.com/preamp-tubes/12ax7-ecc83-7025/mullard-cv4004-12ax7.html), my recommendation (for what it's worth) is put a pair of these babys in and enjoy  >:D
Logged
Studio Rig: Stuff; Live Rig: More Stuff; Guitars: A few

Systematic Chaos

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 705
  • Blood type: Becks Positive
Re: Place to discuss input/preamp tubes
« Reply #14 on: Time Format »

Hey El, SCs talking about the 1st input tube(s) in a poweramp which typically you want to be clean and transparent and not add colour. My mate (mentioned previously) likes them in his HiFi preamp for the line input stage (CD player, AM/FM Radio, cassette player etc).  I think he has other preferences for the phono input (as it needs to add gain), he's still very much into vinyl records etc as they do sound so much better than CDs if you have the right equipment and good pressings.
...not entirely correct with the PI being the 1st input tube in the power amp stage....
Here´s a nice and very in-depth article about the importance of the PI slot (and the tubes that go in there...):

The most important tube in your amp? The Phase inverter!
Many people think that V1 (the first gain stage) is the most important tube in an amp. This is true in some cases but not in all cases. V1 (usually the preamp tube closest to the input jack) has the largest impact on your tone and gain but has less impact on your output distortion touch dynamics and output stage distortion than the phase inverter. The phase inverter is generally the preamp tube that is the most close to your output tubes in most amps.
Let’s think about this for a moment. Today’s amps come in many “flavors”. There are three basic amp topologies looking at things from one viewpoint.
• Non Master volume amplifiers
• Master volume amplifiers
• Channel switching amplifiers
In master volume amps we have pre and post phase inverter master volume controls. These work differently but for this piece of writing I will put them in the same master volume category. Rolling down the master does what? It allows the front end to be driven harder and thus we hear our front end distort. At some point we can drive some amps so hard in the front end that the tone becomes so compressed and distorted that even I can sound like a decent player! Your mistakes are covered up in the mush and distortion of ti all. This distortion is passed down the signal chain where it is reproduced and amplified by the output stage of the amp. This has nothing to do with output stage distortion. This type of distortion is not touch sensitive. This type of distortion is not something that most articulate players would favor for a sweet tone, blues tone, or even classic rock tones. This is NOT what people refer to as the “brown sound”.
Channel switching amps. Many of these amps have so much “junk” in the signal path that hearing tube changes in V1 is a pretty hopeless endeavor. When you do hear a change it is because the tube is closer to industry spec than another tube may have been. If you want to hear different great tones from swapping out V1 then listen to the tube under test in a more classic amp design.
Channel switchers continued. I get calls and letters all the time where people have a “bonzo-3 channel gripmaster Mk III recto” or whatever. Many owners of these amps say: “the owner’s manual says that V3 is used for the turbo channel” or whatever. Remember, V1 feeds EVERYTHING else down the line, EVEN IN THESE AMPS. The “turbo channel” generally does not use JUST V3. The chain is fed by V1. V1, even in multi channel amps is still the most important tube in the TONE AND GAIN stage of most amps. If you want to change the ratio of preamp tube distortion to output tube distortion then we change V1 in some cases. Going from a 12AX7 to a 5751 will reduce front end gain. Going down to a 12AY7 will reduce the front end gain further and generally give one more clean headroom.
Back to the phase inverter. Taking a simple classis non-master volume amp (but this is the same for master volume amps as well actually).
I will try to keep things simple here with a few basics. If you have questions on all the complex versions feel free to contact me.
Fender Tolex era amps – These generally used a 12AT7 in the phase inverter.
Marshall type amps – These generally used a 12AX7 in the phase inverter.
There are many other differences in these amps but I will stick to the PI (phase inverter).
Some basic tube facts
• 12AX7
o Has a published spec gain of 100
o Has a publishes spec current output of 1.2 milliamps
• 12AT7
o Has a published spec gain of 60-70
o Has a published spec current output of 10.0 milliamps (ten times that of the 12AX7
as a side note)
As a third example, a 5751 has a gain which is almost identical to the 12AT7 but it’s standing current is 1.0 milliamps (about the same as the 12AX7). But, there is a third factor, transconductance, to be considered. The 5751 has a transconductance of about 1200. A 12AX7 has a “TC” of about 1600 and a 12AT7 has a TC over 5000. These three tubes act quite differently. A 5751 and 12AX7 are much more closely related than the 5751 and 12AT7.
We will stick to the basic 12AX7 and 12AT7.
When you push your amp hard it is not as much the output tubes distorting as it is the phase inverter breaking down and distorting. We are talking output stage distortion here. We are not talking about how you may have messed up the signal with preamp tube distortion and compression already. The phase inverter may be the hardest worked tube in most amps. I cannot begin to count the times when I have found phase inverters that were long past their service life. When you change your output tubes change that phase inverter. At the least change it every other output tube change.
Many folks think that when they want to have their amp have more clean headroom they can insert a 12AT7 in place of the 12AX7. Very true. (By the way, the 12AT7 in a first gain stage is an awful tone generator in a guitar amp. If you want to drop front end gain use a 5751 (gain of 60-70) or a 12AY7 (gain of 40). The 12AY7 was the first gain stage in the classic Fender Tweed Bassman, Deluxe, etc.
Going from a 12AX7 to a 12AT7 in the PI (phase inverter) will yield a change in output tube distortion, touch, and output dynamics in most amps. Is this because the gain is lower in the 12AT7? 10% yes perhaps. The lower gain is a factor but the larger factors are:
• We have almost 10 times the current available to drive the output tubes before the phase inverter starts to break down.
• We have a transconductance of 5500 vs 1600 of the 12AX7. Keeping this simple, it means it takes a lot less input signal for a given output signal.
The output tubes are less important than many folks may think. Think about this. In the Hi-Fi world there have been many amplifier designs. Some such as the Scott and Fisher lines used EL-84 output tubes. McIntosh used 6L6 and 6550 / KT88 tubes. Dynaco and some British amps used EL-34 tubes. All of these amps, when operated at the rated specs generally stated that from 20-20,000 cycles at .5% distortion or less they were considered “flat” by industry spec. The output tube type had very little to do with anything. In guitar amps we purposely push the output tube beyond their design limits to make them distort. The difference between a Svetlana 6L6 and an RCA 6L6 is the difference in the way the tube sounds when it is pushed beyond it’s design limits. Being in the “tube business” this is not a great subject. What I am basically saying here is: Before you go to a pricy output set of tubes and a possible need to rebias the amp think about a simple phase inverter change. There are no amp adjustments necessary when you change the phase inverter.

In real life we rarely get to the point of pushing our output tubes to their limits. Our front end is going into distortion. Our phase inverter is breaking down too. The ratio of this front end distortion to phase inverter drive and breakdown is determined by amplifier design topology. You cannot make a Marshall into a Fender no matter how many people tell you that this can be done. Putting 6L6 tubes in a Marshall will NOT make it sound like a Fender either.
There are many 12AX7 types of tubes available. They are all different even though they are supposed to have the same specs. Even when one looks at the same tube type from the same maker out of the same production run we find HUGE variances. +/- 50% off spec is common. Most 12AX7s today show a current output of 0.6-0.8 milliamps where 1.2 milliamps is expected. You throw a 12AX7 in your PI slot with a 0.8mA output and you are 30% down on what the amp can do right off the bat. Your amp is not as full, tight, responsive, or just plain “powerful” or dynamic. Many of today’s high production amps use the Sovtek 12AX7WA short plate as a generic 12AX7. I have issues with these in the tone and gain stage but staying with the topic of phase inverters, these are just awful (12AX7WA Sovtek) for the most part. In tests these show very low standing current. The Ei long smooth plate also shows low standing current, even though a long plate. Generally, large plate tubes will show higher standing current but this is not always the case. The JJ ECC83S has the highest standing current of any current production tube. The JJ is a short plate tube. The JJ is an exception. You might think the JJ would be a good PI. Not from my personal taste. The way the JJ breaks down is not as musical to my ear in most amps and I do not care for the touch response and dynamics of the tube in the PI position in most amps. What do I like? I like the Sovtek 12AX7LPS and the GT 12AX7M. The GT 12AX7M is also available as a matched phase inverter from the SAG over at GT as the SAG-AX7- MPI. There is also an SAG-AT7-MPI. I have talked about matched phase inverters in other places prior to this piece of writing. The 12AX7M and 12AX7R2 (Sovtek 12AX7LPS) are both long plate designs. In either case I check these for specs because in all cases there is a wide range of variables from tube to tube and run to run in production.
There are a lot of great NOS tubes. They have advantages in the tone and gain stage but they are not as available as production tubes made today. When you are on the road or on tour these are harder to find. In the case of the phase inverter we do not want to stock a bunch of Mullards or Telefunkens to burn up every output tube set change. There are great current production tubes that give us all we can ask for.
Other great phase inverters to consider are the 5751, 12AY7, and 12AU7.
The bottom line here is simple. The phase inverter is one of the most important tubes in your amp and the hardest worked tube in the preamp section of your amp. It is how this tube breaks down that provides your output stage distortion tone, character, and amp feel.
Myles S. Rose


...and some more info HERE
« Last Edit: Time Format by Systematic Chaos »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up