Just something to consider about those two recordings;
In 1967, when Jimi was recording those songs, it wasn't only the Marshall stacks and Fender amps he was using to play through, it was also the microphones and the recording equipment that was being used to record with.
They were using tube mics, (Telefunken U47's), and the mic preamps were also tube back then, which could load the mic sensitivity to a much better degree than what we have today.
The mixing desk was also tube circuits as well as any compression effects and passive EQ's such as Pultecs. Add to this the 2" Studer tape machines, and you have the basic ingredients for very high fidelity recordings.
Such equipment would be astronomically expensive today, although there are some things out there that can come closer to getting that kind of recording quality. BAE has some very good quality mic pre's that can load a good condenser mic, and if you can afford it, you might find a good used GT Vipre out there, as well as a Pultec EQ. They won't be cheap though.
As I said in the beginning, just something to consider...
Harley
*Note* Sinn, it's true that nothing is quite like having a stack that can move the air around you, and so much more satisfying to play to, (in respect to guitar/amp response), vs. Preamp>direct to PC>direct to headphones/monitors.